Repository navigation
Configuration Syntax #84
nicholas-ochoa
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
|
We'll definitely get to a standard format for the configuration file. In the future, a UI will be created to simplify the work as much as possible. The current structure is dynamic and the option to import from other files has been added to split the settings file and make it more flexible. Take a look at this example |
2 replies
|
The |
0 replies
|
for the fun of it I did a quick hack "json to nss" python script |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This is probably a huge ask, but I keep running in to issues with the syntax (and it seems others do as well).
Is it possible to add support for (or switch entirely over to) a different syntax for configuration? Ideally, something that already exists.
JSON5 (or regular JSON), YAML, or TOML for example.
Something like JSON5 or YAML would allow for a number of huge benefits:
The current syntax is powerful it seems, but I feel like a lot of that power is locked up behind a large learning curve.
All reactions