Replies: 2 comments
No, sorry. I maintain CANnectivity, not BSPs.
I may be a nice solution for you, but I would be stuck with maintaining ports for boards I don't have and don't really have an interest in maintaining support for. Long story short, board support needs to go into upstream Zephyr if a board overlay is needed in CANnectivity. Another option is to keep your board support + CANnectivity board overlay in a downstream repository. |
|
Understandable and I thought that might be the case. Thanks reply. I'll probably keep the boards folder in the project repo and suggest using the |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Related to #159: would you be open to a workspace boards folder specifically for hardware targeting CANnectivity that probably don't warrant being added to upstream in Zephyr?
I've created a V2 of my Entree board that supports CANnecitivity. I have a fork which includes a 'boards' folder in the CANnectivity workspace: main...tuna-f1sh:cannectivity:stm32g01b (still slightly WIP).
It seems like a nice solution for boards specifically designed for CANnectivity, which cannot be defined with an overlay but where the uses within Zephyr as a 'board' are less obvious.
All reactions