Repository navigation
Prevent slow chain polls from starving fee updates - #1146
Open
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The bitcoind polling loop used a biased select over two separate two-second intervals, with the chain polling tick prioritized over the fee rate update tick. If each chain poll took longer than the polling interval, the chain tick was already ready every time we returned to the select, so the fee rate update branch was never taken and fee estimates could go stale indefinitely. Since both intervals fire at the same rate anyway, we now drop the separate fee rate interval and update fee rate estimates right after each chain poll whenever the best block changed. Every step still races against the stop signal, so shutdown remains prompt. This was found by Project Loupe. This change was made with the help of Claude Code.
|
I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The bitcoind polling loop used a biased select over two separate two-second intervals, with the chain polling tick prioritized over the fee rate update tick. If each chain poll took longer than the polling interval, the chain tick was already ready every time we returned to the select, so the fee rate update branch was never taken and fee estimates could go stale indefinitely.
Since both intervals fire at the same rate anyway, we now drop the separate fee rate interval and update fee rate estimates right after each chain poll whenever the best block changed. Every step still races against the stop signal, so shutdown remains prompt.
This was found by Project Loupe.