Repository navigation
Add 303.4-303.6: galaxy morphology classification, clustering, and stellar mass regression - #229
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
828a68b to
d366afa
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,626 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggest mentioning "RandomForest" at the introduction (i.e. specify the regressor used in this notebook at the beginning).
Reply via ReviewNB
| @@ -0,0 +1,626 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggest mentioning that "+ structural" gives less scatter (consistent with the RMSE test above).
Reply via ReviewNB
| @@ -0,0 +1,626 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggest mentioning "the better of the two models" is actually "color + magnitude + redshift + structural" since it's using "model_all", just for clarification.
Reply via ReviewNB
shenmingfu
left a comment
shenmingfu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you! I left some comments on the wording. I will approve the PR.
…ellar mass regression
… distance correction, add VizieR failure handling, and wording fixes
… distance correction, add VizieR failure handling, and wording fixes
…catter improvement from structural measurements, and clarify model_all is the better model
8447ad9 to
6fbf383
Compare
No description provided.