OLS-3548 Regenerate bundle for temperatureSupported

[xrajesh]

Depends on #1993 and should be merged after it.

This PR contains only the generated bundle manifest updates for temperatureSupported, split out so #1993 can run/pass the operator tests first.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Documented the model temperature support setting.
  • Clarified that leaving the setting unset defaults to supported, while disabling it applies to models that reject temperature parameters.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: c6964663-b7a0-42f2-a7bd-d7bfe189ac2f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa7e4de and 96b6ec6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• bundle/manifests/ols.openshift.io_olsconfigs.yaml is excluded by !bundle/manifests/ols.openshift.io_olsconfigs.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• bundle/manifests/lightspeed-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 10 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The CSV spec now describes the temperatureSupported model parameter. It states that an unset value means temperature is supported and that false applies to models that reject temperature.

Changes

Model Parameter Documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Temperature support descriptor bundle/manifests/lightspeed-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml	Adds the display name and behavior description for temperatureSupported.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 96b6e

This updates the bundle descriptor documentation for temperature support behavior. No current merge-blocking risk is identified.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the bundle regeneration for the temperatureSupported parameter, which matches the pull request changes and objective.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[xrajesh]

/retest

[sriroopar]

/lgtm

[xrajesh]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xrajesh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [xrajesh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[xrajesh]

@sriroopar @JoaoFula I am overriding this , but we will have to address the bugs identified.

[xrajesh]

/override "Red Hat Konflux / service-e2e-tests-419 / ols-bundle"

[openshift-ci]

@xrajesh: Overrode contexts on behalf of xrajesh: Red Hat Konflux / service-e2e-tests-419 / ols-bundle

Details

In response to this:

/override "Red Hat Konflux / service-e2e-tests-419 / ols-bundle"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-ci]

@xrajesh: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.